PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.43%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.99%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
29.39%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
29.39%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
29.08%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
33.33%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
20.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.56%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
5.70%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.56%
Dividend growth under 50% of INTC's 5.01%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
-40.45%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 20.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.16%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 11.63%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
104.35%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 109.77%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
58.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.59%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
60.18%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
964.73%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 140.19%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
152.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
109.07%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
186.92%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 170.99%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
87.97%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.91%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
187.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.21%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
166.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 113.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
36.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 50.00%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
17.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 22.49%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.80%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.87%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
23.14%
AR growth well above INTC's 9.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
32.23%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 9.02%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.97%
Asset growth at 75-90% of INTC's 5.59%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
7.37%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.95%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.07%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 24.21%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
1.16%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-1.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.