PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.13%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
13.22%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.19%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 17.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
24.19%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 17.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
14.99%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
13.64%
EPS growth similar to INTC's 13.68%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
15.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
0.84%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-1.25%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
1.58%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.54%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
150.00%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.97%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
185.53%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
118.59%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 119.57%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
121.41%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 41.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
89.07%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.59%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
95.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 221.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
263.88%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 68.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
584.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 120.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
209.42%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 283.30%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
407.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 168.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
325.96%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 89.37%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
142.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 112.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
39.06%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 39.31%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
29.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 24.28%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.05%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
24.28%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
4.14%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.77%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.09%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.41%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-6.20%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.22%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.81%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
7.03%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.