176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.21%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
20.51%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 18.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
30.09%
EBIT growth 75-90% of INTC's 39.37%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
30.09%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of INTC's 39.37%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
43.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 27.81%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
40.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 29.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
43.48%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 31.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
1.01%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.79%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
64.11%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 19.18%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
67.13%
FCF growth similar to INTC's 72.88%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
117.46%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 129.75%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
125.94%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.77%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
95.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
180.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 229.25%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
557.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 67.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
387.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
227.27%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 289.14%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
313.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 136.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
340.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 113.57%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
135.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with INTC's 125.04%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
38.81%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 40.38%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
37.24%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 29.93%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 24.99%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-3.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 17.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.23%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 0.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
4.55%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.80%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.29%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 3.72%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-3.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
11.06%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.69%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
7.07%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.