PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.62%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 2.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.50%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 8.68%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-10.66%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 10.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.66%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 10.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.50%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 5.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.76%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 6.82%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-12.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 5.75%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.17%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.16%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-36.82%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 52.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.92%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 146.21%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
220.12%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 157.69%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
208.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.09%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
141.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 29.14%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
931.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 180.88%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
812.65%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
399.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 108.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
933.08%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 1415.44%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
1000.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 66.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
3674.18%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 232.71%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
202.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 140.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
103.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 41.09%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
87.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 29.32%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.46%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.06%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
53.03%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.43%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
36.23%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
36.76%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 11.99%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.41%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.00%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.78%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.34%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.05%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 1.15%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
7.20%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 3.18%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.60%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.