PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.86%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 16.27%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-2.73%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 14.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-8.56%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 39.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.56%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 39.64%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
11.72%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 43.34%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
13.33%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 44.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
11.36%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 46.74%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.33%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.16%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.33%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-46.66%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 41.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-57.02%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 49.74%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
216.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 157.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
187.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.54%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
116.94%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
911.25%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 237.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
186.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 109.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
69.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 100.55%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
1678.73%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 306.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
888.08%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 100.70%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
344.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 91.18%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
240.19%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 139.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
109.17%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 44.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
88.86%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.82%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.01%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.67%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
52.81%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.39%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
33.51%
AR growth well above INTC's 10.38%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
30.00%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
6.02%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.30%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
7.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.75%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.55%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.13%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.86%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.