PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.68%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 5.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-37.17%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 5.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-69.57%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-69.57%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-53.90%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 15.28%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-54.90%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 17.65%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-53.06%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 17.04%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.96%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
7.69%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
84.39%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
106.23%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
304.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 144.56%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
79.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 51.58%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
39.30%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 35.31%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
4094.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 271.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
109.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 89.19%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
55.53%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
438.98%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 287.01% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
260.26%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 108.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
142.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 112.52%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
244.40%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 137.69%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
95.68%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
85.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.30%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.29%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.68%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
42.19%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.10%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-35.83%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 11.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
11.15%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.23%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.67%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 2.06%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-1.40%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 6.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.10%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.33%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
6.94%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 5.49%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
3.10%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.