PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.68%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.37%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
11.18%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.55%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
11.18%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-30.51%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-30.43%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-30.43%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.48%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.69%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 4.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-19.82%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-14.82%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
198.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 149.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
85.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 72.41%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
50.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 48.37%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
352.59%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 95.66%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
339.12%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
106.14%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 74.90%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
274.83%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 200.45%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
165.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 215.83%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
77.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of INTC's 111.45%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
273.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 130.67%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
114.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
104.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.19%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.62%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
38.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 26.84%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the company's short-term profits or payout policy justify these higher hikes.
-12.78%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 10.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-9.46%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 5.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.48%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 8.19%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.22%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
28.47%
Debt growth far above INTC's 37.65%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.17%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-0.75%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.