PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.17%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
18.90%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
59.50%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
59.50%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
40.10%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
43.75%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
43.75%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.33%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.70%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.11%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
30.00%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 81.18%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
39.02%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 168.13%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
198.11%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 140.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
114.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 67.58%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
58.36%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 48.23%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
521.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 319.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
791.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 263.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
346.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 162.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
570.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 131.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
295.37%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 111.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
91.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of INTC's 101.67%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
312.81%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 134.39%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
120.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
102.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 32.56%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.38%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.22%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
38.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.93%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
25.68%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-15.57%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.38%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.27%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.16%
75-90% of INTC's 7.91%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.08%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.45%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 2.41%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
0.76%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.