PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.87%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
24.33%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
62.35%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
62.35%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
62.86%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
60.87%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
56.52%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.16%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.32%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-1.18%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 1.46%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
75.21%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
86.76%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
201.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 119.82%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
120.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.66%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
32.65%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 27.08%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
948.80%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 204.38%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
583.02%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
215.81%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
655.24%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 92.63% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
366.75%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
46.29%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
318.16%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 108.08%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
139.51%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 48.00%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
85.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 17.65%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
89.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.60%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
40.25%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.98%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-6.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-13.04%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.01%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.32%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.31%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.14%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.14%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.