PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 8.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.17%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 16.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.80%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 16.31%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.80%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 16.31%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
5.67%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 36.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
5.41%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 40.20%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
5.56%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 39.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.33%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.49%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.70%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-10.67%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 20.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-14.05%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 30.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
188.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 136.47%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
120.78%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.50%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
29.11%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 34.01%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
1829.29%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 141.66%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
194.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 110.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
83.60%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 56.23%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
560.92%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 149.78% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
337.38%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 86.98%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
31.06%
Below 50% of INTC's 1075.20%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
317.57%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 122.33%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
145.62%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
91.38%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 34.31%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
88.54%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.74%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
16.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 21.10%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
13.88%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-6.49%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
9.52%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.39%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.47%
75-90% of INTC's 11.19%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.16%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
3.65%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 11.71%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.61%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 22.44%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.