PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.15%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.95%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
29.79%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.79%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
31.23%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 75.49%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
30.51%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 74.56%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
31.03%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 75.22%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.32%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.25%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.29%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.32%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 4.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.34%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 1.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.66%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 159.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
463.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 74.28%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
275.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.62%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
72.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
942.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 142.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
424.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 74.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
26.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 30.82%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements in margin or overhead to catch up.
1254.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 263.14% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
743.56%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 216.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
49.99%
Below 50% of INTC's 124.82%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
421.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 170.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
286.90%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 78.65%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
137.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.19%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.08%
Similar 5Y dividend/share CAGR to INTC's 40.10%. Walter Schloss sees parallel philosophies in mid-term capital returns.
6.16%
Below 50% of INTC's 15.81%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
24.50%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
9.09%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 10.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.96%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 4.72%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
10.78%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 7.85%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
1.86%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
0.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 7.73%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.38%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.