PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.94%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.15%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.95%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.95%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.16%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
23.38%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.68%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.36%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.51%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.65%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.29%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
43.12%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
58.57%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
517.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 39.00%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
290.42%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.22%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
102.92%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1.11%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3054.94%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1148.88%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
186.10%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1411.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
703.97%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
110.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
453.02%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 154.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
304.44%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 69.44%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
134.17%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 47.11%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.19%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 33.80%. Bruce Berkowitz verifies that high dividend hikes remain sustainable, not a sign of over-distribution.
7.02%
Below 50% of INTC's 15.47%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
18.58%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
6.12%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
25.50%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.23%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
63.60%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
7.98%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.87%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.15%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 2.74%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.