PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.60%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
7.95%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
11.19%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.19%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.88%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
21.21%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.20%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.36%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.19%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.20%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
99.67%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
112.63%
FCF growth similar to INTC's 117.24%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
683.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.24%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
210.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
237.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
621.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.66%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
228.58%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2428.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
305.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
415.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
526.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 138.10%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
308.00%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 66.50%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
177.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.75%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.24%
Below 50% of INTC's 33.79%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
-0.73%
Negative near-term dividend growth while INTC invests at 15.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
17.60%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.66%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 3.06%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
8.75%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.15%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
11.60%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.03%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.49%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 3.77%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.08%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.