PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.11%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 10.53%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-46.33%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 15.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-73.29%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 30.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-73.29%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 30.79%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-59.46%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 153.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-60.00%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 153.03%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-59.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 153.03%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.44%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.83%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.44%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-26.63%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 257.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-38.91%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 66.51%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
537.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.32%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
187.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
153.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
527.38%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
72.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
32.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
446.85%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
7.70%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
16.03%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
431.45%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 123.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
282.19%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 60.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
125.30%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.94%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-0.37%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-2.23%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
22.95%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-3.84%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-8.98%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 3.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.06%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
12.73%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.