PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 8.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
20.65%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 17.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
108.99%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 32412.50%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
108.99%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 32412.50%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
107.94%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 798.65%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
111.11%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 800.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
111.11%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 800.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.77%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.88%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.24%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
473.72%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1360.87%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
450.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.12%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
104.49%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
93.61%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
402.03%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
62.92%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
52.52%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
718.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.71% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
24.42%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
47.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
360.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 113.41%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
191.02%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 52.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
79.92%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
110.52%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
5.94%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-0.65%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-22.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 19.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
15.83%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.71%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 1.45%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
4.32%
1.25-1.5x INTC's 3.56%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
8.26%
Debt growth far above INTC's 0.82%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.36%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 3.02%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-0.95%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 20.67%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.