PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.86%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
21.26%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
70.38%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
70.38%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.48%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
45.61%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
43.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.24%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.47%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.52%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.78%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
29.44%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
53.05%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
652.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
120.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
132.18%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1555.59%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
97.70%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
218.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2520.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
61.17%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
121.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
407.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 114.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
211.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 52.34%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
86.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.96%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
113.76%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
6.77%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
0.45%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
6.61%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-10.62%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
7.96%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.61%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.68%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.24%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.90%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 6.44%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-3.94%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 9.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.28%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.