NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.49%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.

Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.

Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.59%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.35%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.

FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 52.87%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 8.31%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 127.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 60.92%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.33%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.

Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.

Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.99%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

1.25-1.5x INTC's 8.10%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.

We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.10%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.