PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.15%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
41.62%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
53.19%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
53.19%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
49.37%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
48.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.20%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-2.80%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
15.50%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 76.88%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.42%
FCF growth 50-75% of INTC's 29.09%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
1518.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
462.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
284.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4152.63%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1386.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
474.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7228.78%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
641.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
592.96%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
624.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 98.58%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
246.53%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.16%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
117.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 4.54%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
110.43%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
5.21%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
-1.86%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
17.59%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
10.65%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 7.27%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.27%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
21.20%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.67%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
12.45%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
10.77%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 4.06%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.