PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
21.98%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
25.31%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 179.62%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
30.69%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 109.43%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
30.69%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 104.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
32.91%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 99.24%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
31.58%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 99.25%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
32.43%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 99.25%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.08%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.16%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.14%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
56.83%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
59.41%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1681.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.96%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
890.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
343.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2546.14%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1164.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
458.57%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7610.59%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2040.31%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
746.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
789.30%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 96.21%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
354.45%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.08%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
155.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
88.89%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
-0.21%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
0.41%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
20.34%
AR growth well above INTC's 11.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.53%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.13%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
21.39%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.52%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
29.30%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.26%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
7.45%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.34%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.