NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while INTC is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 8.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 98.27%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.33%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.75%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.

We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.