NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 151.45% while INTC is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 137.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 84.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.

Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.

Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.