PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.87%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
17.31%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
17.31%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
16.33%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
16.18%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
16.42%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.18%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.30%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.60%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.22%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
21.67%
OCF growth under 50% of INTC's 152.15%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
24.45%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 65.68%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
2457.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1057.66%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
403.10%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
7201.40%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
968.99%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1082.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 137.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
9870.55%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2036.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
698.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1299.84%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 84.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
484.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
182.07%
Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
374.95%
Stable or rising dividend while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
151.21%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while INTC is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
149.56%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while INTC cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
25.20%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
14.67%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
12.66%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.14%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.52%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2.10%
Debt growth far above INTC's 1.21%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
9.71%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.21%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.53%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.