NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Revenue growth above 1.5x MRVL's 1.45%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.

Positive gross profit growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction more than 1.5x MRVL's 0.49%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Dividend growth above 1.5x MRVL's 0.09%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.

Positive OCF growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 29.28%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 40.89%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 16.52%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while MRVL is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MRVL is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while MRVL is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 101.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 28.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MRVL's 39.71%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Stable or rising dividend while MRVL is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.

Stable or rising mid-term dividends while MRVL is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.

Our short-term dividend growth is positive while MRVL cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.

Positive asset growth while MRVL is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while MRVL is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We increase R&D while MRVL cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.

We cut SG&A while MRVL invests at 5.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.