PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.64%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.58%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
22.90%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
22.90%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
25.25%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-15.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
3.57%
Slight or no buyback while MU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.49%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-11.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1115.61%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
93.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 15.35%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
93.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 7.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
188.68%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1953.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
188.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
188.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 82.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
168.12%
Below 50% of MU's 2117.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
168.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
168.12%
Below 50% of MU's 1949.05%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
95.63%
Below 50% of MU's 739.68%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
95.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 151.24%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
95.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 44.56%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
46.92%
Inventory growth well above MU's 45.63%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
121.35%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 1.77%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
54.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 17.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-24.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
15.78%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 5.92%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.31%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.