PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.30%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.08%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.27%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
26.27%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
24.62%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
157.14%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
150.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-48.95%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-49.43%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.53%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 579.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-32.27%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 63.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
82.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 314.86%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
82.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
82.27%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
50.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 546.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
50.24%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
50.24%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 10912.48%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
136.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
136.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
136.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
227.76%
Below 50% of MU's 855.53%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
227.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 109.16%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
227.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 83.12%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.63%
AR growth well above MU's 17.16%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
36.78%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
93.88%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
243.60%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
16866.72%
Debt growth far above MU's 100.40%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
9.34%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
1.71%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.