PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.04%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.76%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 82.17%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
13.92%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 36.57%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
13.92%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 36.57%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
14.32%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 46.14%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
27.78%
EPS growth at 50-75% of MU's 46.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 46.39%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-14.98%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
3.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.58%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 16.88%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
175.14%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 49.82%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
537.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 235.54%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
537.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
537.74%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1014.35%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 152.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1014.35%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1014.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
926.41%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
926.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
926.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
779.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 645.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
779.74%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 11.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
779.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 22.06%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.77%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
18.73%
Inventory growth well above MU's 5.24%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
6.42%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
33.76%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-0.28%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
17.89%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 13.19%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.81%
SG&A growth well above MU's 9.28%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.