PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.71%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.96%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 131.71%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-912.75%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 69.41%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-912.75%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 69.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1025.69%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 65.29%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-966.67%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 65.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-966.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 65.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.68%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-9.15%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13562.28%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 83.59%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
420.66%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 58.03%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
240.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 106.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
240.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
240.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
567.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
567.31%
Below 50% of MU's 2600.81%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
567.31%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-452.26%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-452.26%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-452.26%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
586.03%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 442.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
586.03%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 26.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
586.03%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.65%
AR growth well above MU's 2.67%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-28.14%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 17.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.90%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.15%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.51%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.96%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
7.76%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.