PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.98%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 21.26%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
49.12%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 138.73%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
241.17%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 42.51%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
241.17%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 42.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
204.73%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 42.67%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
196.15%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 42.86%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
196.15%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 42.86%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
9.26%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.26%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.23%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 138.09%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
31.32%
FCF growth 50-75% of MU's 56.21%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
227.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 75.73%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
227.44%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
227.44%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2003.06%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2003.06%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 20.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
2003.06%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
212.78%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
212.78%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 4.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
212.78%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
571.10%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 370.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
571.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 27.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
571.10%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.10%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. MU's 29.67%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-29.26%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.78%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 0.22%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.70%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 2.72%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
145.70%
SG&A growth well above MU's 42.43%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.