PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.72%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 12.69%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
3.20%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 56.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-37.64%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 1645.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.64%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 1645.07%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-73.68%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 421.20%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-76.92%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 418.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 395.45%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.89%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.85%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 9.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-145.79%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 11.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
32.57%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
265.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 71.79%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
265.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 6.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
100.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 26.33%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-159.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 4.93%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-159.80%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is at 14.31%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-139.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 19.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-56.29%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-56.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while MU is 371.31%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-81.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 126.85%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
647.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 297.66%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
647.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 16.04%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
128.20%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.72%
Inventory growth well above MU's 19.51%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-18.05%
Negative asset growth while MU invests at 1.49%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.49%
Under 50% of MU's 1.77%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-97.28%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
11.33%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.28%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 15.28%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.