PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
3.51%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.06%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 199.68%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
5.06%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 199.68%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
16.13%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 208.31%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
15.63%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 190.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 200.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.18%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 1.75%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 1.06%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.14%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 106.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-76.13%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 343.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
386.85%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
416.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 3.18%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
21.27%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 43.24%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
1047.86%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 262.07%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
200.98%
Below 50% of MU's 2595.42%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
6289.46%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 3054.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
637.92%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
408.37%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 296.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
1184.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 128.61%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
921.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 87.45%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
846.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 20.53%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.23%
AR growth well above MU's 15.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-2.21%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 0.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.70%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 17.07%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.45%
Under 50% of MU's 23.65%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-100.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.12%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.54%
SG&A growth well above MU's 13.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.