PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.50%
Revenue growth under 50% of MU's 7.13%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.89%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 40.34%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-10.62%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.81%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.51%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-9.09%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.65%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 7.12%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.38%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.77%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.62%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
288.91%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
316.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 3.05%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
128.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 34.95%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 53.75%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
454.49%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
269.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 62.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-16.91%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 600.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
326.17%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
80.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 123.76%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
220.98%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 135.35%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
849.40%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 73.28%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
189.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
38.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 19.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.03%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.35%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 16.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.47%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 9.85%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 2.70%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 4.81%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.52%
SG&A growth well above MU's 4.81%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.