NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 25.19%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 31.26%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 54.48%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 19.78%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Inventory is declining while MU stands at 12.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.

Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 7.78%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.

We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.