PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.10%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 11.05%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
15.50%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 63.21%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
17.77%
EBIT growth similar to MU's 17.44%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
17.77%
Operating income growth similar to MU's 17.44%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
53.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 29.78%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
36.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 27.59%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
51.11%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 27.59%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
8.15%
Share change of 8.15% while MU is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.06%
Diluted share change of 2.06% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.37%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 87.01%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.62%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
439.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 13.97%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
64.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 28.00%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
57.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3325.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 22.32%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
350.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 1.84%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
20671.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
782.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 2.58% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
108.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
473.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1169.28%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 57.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
144.32%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 23.41%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
61.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 11.44%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.08%
AR growth well above MU's 18.47%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-5.05%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 5.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.69%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 2.78%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.54%
Under 50% of MU's 1.42%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 3.70%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
15.31%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
12.33%
SG&A growth well above MU's 6.72%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.