PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.78%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.54%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
30.81%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
30.81%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
30.60%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.00%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.91%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.12%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.92%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 2.17%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
11.97%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 47.03%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
633.56%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
82.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 36.09%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
86.88%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
6238.44%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 344.65%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
41278.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 765.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1144.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1477.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
2644.50%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 1.35%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2975.01%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1576.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 28.71%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
113.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 0.01%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
88.08%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.83%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-16.93%
Inventory is declining while MU stands at 0.42%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.40%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.65%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Our R&D shrinks while MU invests at 10.43%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
0.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 7.14%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.