PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.28%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MU's 10.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.59%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 211.63%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
34.14%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 70.85%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
34.14%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 70.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
36.43%
Net income growth at 50-75% of MU's 69.63%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
41.03%
EPS growth at 50-75% of MU's 69.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
31.94%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 69.31%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.40%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.52%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.80%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
9.76%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
631.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 33.73%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
114.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 60.93%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
94.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 19.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2203.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 9188.52%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
245.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to MU's 263.42%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
78514.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1314.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
501.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 13.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
717.34%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1502.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 27.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
133.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 0.70%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
100.66%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.65%
AR growth well above MU's 11.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.80%
Inventory growth well above MU's 0.28%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
14.46%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.12%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.49%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.