PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-22.60%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-70.88%
Negative gross profit growth while MU is at 40.53%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-176.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-176.56%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-168.40%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-167.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-172.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.05%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.18%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
148.21%
FCF growth similar to MU's 162.92%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
589.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
67.87%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
41.71%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1578.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 89.33%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
272.05%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 21.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
56.03%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-1188.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-532.96%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-247.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1845.86%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
131.20%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
90.55%
Positive short-term equity growth while MU is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.24%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.89%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.01%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.67%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.71%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.68%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.