PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.54%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.64%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-13.86%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-13.86%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-21.22%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.31%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-22.54%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.95%
Slight or no buybacks while MU is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.97%
Slight or no buyback while MU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.38%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 14.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-65.89%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 43.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
179.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 201.03%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
23.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 6.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-22.08%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU stands at 17.46%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
237.34%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
199.82%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
10.76%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
265.36%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 57.06% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
30.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-28.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while MU is 79.13%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
420.13%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
88.06%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to MU's 18.84%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.60%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
10.26%
Inventory growth well above MU's 0.82%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.37%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.30%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.85%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 5.90%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.40%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 10.05%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-32.34%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.