PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.66%
Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.42%
Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.38%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
12.38%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
12.09%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
8.62%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
14.55%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
1.10%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.07%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.14%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.37%
Negative OCF growth while MU is at 42.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-58.37%
Negative FCF growth while MU is at 162.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
176.31%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 95.53%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
29.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 13.29%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
5.18%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 63.91%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-0.16%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 531.39%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
321.47%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 56.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-6.42%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU stands at 33.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
219.36%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
52.64%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
215.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 76.51%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
394.74%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
94.82%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
27.97%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 33.58%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.36%
Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-5.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.73%
Positive asset growth while MU is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.85%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.02%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 9.25%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
7.00%
We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.52%
SG&A declining or stable vs. MU's 15.23%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.