PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.60%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.98%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-37.94%
Negative EBIT growth while MU is at 26.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-37.94%
Negative operating income growth while MU is at 26.70%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-34.92%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 24.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.25%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 25.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.72%
Share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 2.53%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.82%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x MU's 2.61%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.96%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
77.88%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
66.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 56.56%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
1.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 3.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
74.20%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 25.60%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
650.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 214.72%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
66.63%
Below 50% of MU's 137.67%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
1918.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 5.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
38.55%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 75.28%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-33.64%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
169.09%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
371.99%
Positive growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
93.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
52.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 37.83%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.48%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
9.12%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.08%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.59%
Positive BV/share change while MU is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.32%
We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 2.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.04%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 1.73%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.