PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.36%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 11.01%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
7.77%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 16.27%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.86%
Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.86%
Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-15.85%
Negative net income growth while MU stands at 20.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.64%
Negative EPS growth while MU is at 19.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while MU is at 23.81%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.55%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
4.96%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.10%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
15.73%
Dividend growth of 15.73% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
100.39%
OCF growth at 75-90% of MU's 130.33%. Bill Ackman would demand better working capital management or cost discipline.
108.40%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 17.21%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
128.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 68.67%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
71.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 49.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
45.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 16.87%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
134.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 95.26%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
27.25%
Below 50% of MU's 151.03%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
30.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to MU's 29.06%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
118.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
30.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
36.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
217.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 7.16%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 41.45%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
6.51%
Below 50% of MU's 36.47%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 49.76% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-5.78%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.73%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 2.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
0.65%
BV/share growth of 0.65% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
6.56%
Debt growth far above MU's 2.90%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
4.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 7.59%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.92%
SG&A growth well above MU's 6.08%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.