PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.43%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of MU's 10.28%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
10.14%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MU's 19.28%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
14.71%
EBIT growth 50-75% of MU's 27.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
14.71%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of MU's 27.46%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
20.85%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 43.78%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 42.95%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
19.05%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 42.14%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
2.79%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.27%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.07%
Diluted share count expanding well above MU's 0.85%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
21.21%
Dividend growth of 21.21% while MU is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
57.42%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 33.07%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
59.52%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 47.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
155.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 196.53%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
152.06%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 185.42%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
95.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 39.84%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
223.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1444.18%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
94.19%
Below 50% of MU's 549.71%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
84.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 129.00%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
314.22%
Below 50% of MU's 1140.46%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
524.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 989.51%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
358.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 98.30%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
196.87%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 66.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
53.67%
Below 50% of MU's 120.74%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
32.92%
Below 50% of MU's 66.49%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 61.66% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.84%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 7.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
16.94%
Inventory growth well above MU's 1.93%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.38%
Asset growth well under 50% of MU's 6.22%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.29%
BV/share growth of 5.29% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-7.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.63%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 3.00%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
2.92%
We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.