PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.21%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MU's 6.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
20.51%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x MU's 10.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
30.09%
EBIT growth above 1.5x MU's 10.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
30.09%
Operating income growth above 1.5x MU's 10.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
43.74%
Net income growth above 1.5x MU's 15.53%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
40.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 15.38%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
43.48%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x MU's 16.10%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.01%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.26%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.79%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.00%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
64.11%
Positive OCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
67.13%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
117.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 247.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
125.94%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 197.19%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
95.42%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to MU's 87.35%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
180.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 1209.29%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
557.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 503.31%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
387.45%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 195.49%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
227.27%
Below 50% of MU's 1180.13%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
313.67%
Below 50% of MU's 7755.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
340.13%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of MU's 620.84%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
135.92%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of MU's 193.53%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
38.81%
Below 50% of MU's 245.41%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
37.24%
Below 50% of MU's 112.90%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.63%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 65.63% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.79%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 10.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.23%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. MU's 5.81%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
4.55%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 1.41%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.29%
BV/share growth of 5.29% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-3.04%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
11.06%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 15.30%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
7.07%
SG&A growth well above MU's 7.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.