PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.86%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of MU's 11.48%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
6.66%
Gross profit growth under 50% of MU's 25.14%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
7.80%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 64.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
7.80%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 64.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
9.06%
Net income growth under 50% of MU's 56.77%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
9.26%
EPS growth under 50% of MU's 56.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
9.43%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of MU's 57.24%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.16%
Share count expansion well above MU's 0.18%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.16%
Slight or no buyback while MU is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.16%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
61.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x MU's 9.10%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
121.34%
FCF growth above 1.5x MU's 43.66%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
432.02%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 241.60%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
210.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 129.12%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
68.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 1.18%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
348.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of MU's 869.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
252.22%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of MU's 286.16%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
49.01%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
700.06%
Below 50% of MU's 1880.14%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
512.90%
Below 50% of MU's 1525.33%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
27.59%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
400.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x MU's 358.28%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
229.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with MU's 223.98%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
121.37%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 40.40%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.32%
Dividend/share CAGR of 41.32% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
6.51%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 6.51% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-4.60%
Firm’s AR is declining while MU shows 25.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
22.14%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.11%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 5.19%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
9.99%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 3.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.42%
Debt growth far above MU's 0.72%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
9.55%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 5.22%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.33%
We cut SG&A while MU invests at 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.