NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction while MU is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Maintaining or increasing dividends while MU cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 65.50%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 36.50%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 94.86%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 29.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Dividend/share CAGR of 13.94% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 18.31%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

We increase R&D while MU cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.