PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.15%
Revenue growth above 1.5x MU's 16.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
41.62%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of MU's 69.79%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
53.19%
EBIT growth below 50% of MU's 2193.94%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
53.19%
Operating income growth under 50% of MU's 2193.94%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
49.37%
Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
48.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.20%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.20%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.81%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-2.80%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
15.50%
OCF growth under 50% of MU's 103.61%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
16.42%
FCF growth under 50% of MU's 340.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
1518.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 64.86%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
462.25%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 41.99%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
284.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
4152.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 64.42%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1386.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
474.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
7228.78%
Positive 10Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
641.72%
Positive 5Y CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
592.96%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
624.82%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 328.84%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
246.53%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 24.98%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
117.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 5.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
110.43%
Dividend/share CAGR of 110.43% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
5.21%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.21% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-1.86%
Negative near-term dividend growth while MU invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
17.59%
AR growth well above MU's 19.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.65%
Inventory growth well above MU's 0.82%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.27%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 0.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
21.20%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 0.55%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.67%
We have some new debt while MU reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
12.45%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 2.16%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
10.77%
SG&A growth well above MU's 3.93%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.