NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Positive revenue growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while MU is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while MU is at 0.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Maintaining or increasing dividends while MU cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.

10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 86.19%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 67.27%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 3.80%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 203.52%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 96.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 9.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 63.25% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 289.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 276.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 30.89%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 2.01%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

Dividend/share CAGR of 371.18% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.

Dividend/share CAGR of 148.79% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.

3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 16.49%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.

Our AR growth while MU is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 2.23%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.

BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 3.55%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

We’re deleveraging while MU stands at 8.05%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.

We expand SG&A while MU cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.