PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.78%
Revenue growth similar to MU's 15.50%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
15.87%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of MU's 18.39%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
17.31%
EBIT growth 75-90% of MU's 19.57%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
17.31%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of MU's 22.34%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
16.33%
Net income growth at 75-90% of MU's 19.08%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
16.18%
EPS growth at 75-90% of MU's 19.01%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
16.42%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of MU's 19.15%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.18%
Share reduction while MU is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.30%
Reduced diluted shares while MU is at 0.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.22%
Dividend reduction while MU stands at 0.50%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
21.67%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x MU's 16.92%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
24.45%
Positive FCF growth while MU is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2457.03%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 131.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1057.66%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 69.97%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
403.10%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 7.05%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
7201.40%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 231.35%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
968.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 126.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1082.05%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 19.44%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
9870.55%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 268.46% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2036.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 133.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
698.24%
Positive short-term CAGR while MU is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1299.84%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 290.96%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
484.46%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 33.34%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
182.07%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 2.42%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
374.95%
Dividend/share CAGR of 374.95% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
151.21%
Dividend/share CAGR of 151.21% while MU is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
149.56%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x MU's 17.38%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
25.20%
AR growth well above MU's 14.33%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
14.67%
We show growth while MU is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
12.66%
Asset growth above 1.5x MU's 7.32%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
13.52%
BV/share growth above 1.5x MU's 4.07%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2.10%
Debt shrinking faster vs. MU's 4.34%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
9.71%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. MU's 7.46%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
6.53%
SG&A growth well above MU's 11.58%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.