PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
24.36%
Positive revenue growth while TSM is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.92%
Positive gross profit growth while TSM is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
58.95%
Positive EBIT growth while TSM is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
58.95%
Positive operating income growth while TSM is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.21%
Positive net income growth while TSM is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
60.00%
EPS growth of 60.00% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
50.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 50.00% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
5.47%
Slight or no buybacks while TSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
5.47%
Slight or no buyback while TSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
418.18%
OCF growth of 418.18% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
196.36%
FCF growth of 196.36% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.35%
AR growth of 12.35% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
39.29%
Inventory growth of 39.29% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
17.26%
Asset growth of 17.26% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
13.08%
BV/share growth of 13.08% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
3.45%
Debt growth of 3.45% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
14.81%
R&D growth of 14.81% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
14.81%
SG&A growth of 14.81% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.