PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x TSM's 1.66%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.54%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x TSM's 6.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
30.81%
EBIT growth above 1.5x TSM's 10.01%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
30.81%
Operating income growth above 1.5x TSM's 10.01%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
30.60%
Net income growth above 1.5x TSM's 2.09%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
30.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x TSM's 3.17%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
30.91%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x TSM's 3.17%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.12%
Slight or no buybacks while TSM is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.92%
Slight or no buyback while TSM is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.03%
Positive OCF growth while TSM is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
11.97%
Positive FCF growth while TSM is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
633.56%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 387.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
82.72%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of TSM's 101.17%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
86.88%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 53.06%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
6238.44%
OCF/share CAGR of 6238.44% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
41278.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 68.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1144.41%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 56.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1477.23%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 438.20% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2644.50%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 277.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2975.01%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 70.82%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1576.12%
Equity/share CAGR of 1576.12% while TSM is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
113.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 56.62%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
88.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x TSM's 20.51%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.83%
AR growth well above TSM's 10.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-16.93%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
8.40%
Positive asset growth while TSM is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
6.65%
Positive BV/share change while TSM is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
0.88%
We expand SG&A while TSM cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.