PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.68%
Positive revenue growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
7.37%
Positive gross profit growth while Semiconductors median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
11.18%
EBIT growth of 11.18% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
11.18%
Positive operating income growth while Semiconductors is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
-30.51%
Negative net income growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-30.43%
Negative EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-30.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.33%
Share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.48%
Diluted share reduction while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.69%
Dividend cuts while Semiconductors median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-19.82%
Negative OCF growth while Semiconductors median is -4.46%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-14.82%
Negative FCF growth while Semiconductors median is -7.09%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
198.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 32.86%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
85.42%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 19.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
50.50%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
352.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 352.59% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
339.12%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 19.59%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
106.14%
3Y OCF/share growth of 106.14% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
274.83%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 42.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
165.83%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
77.84%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 7.60%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
273.88%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 61.35% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
114.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 32.83%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
104.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Semiconductors median of 17.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
91.19%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 91.19% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
38.41%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 38.41% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-12.78%
AR shrinking while Semiconductors median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-9.46%
Decreasing inventory while Semiconductors is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.48%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Semiconductors median of 0.47%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
4.22%
BV/share growth of 4.22% while Semiconductors is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
28.47%
Debt growth of 28.47% while Semiconductors median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
4.17%
We slightly increase R&D while Semiconductors is cutting. Peter Lynch sees a chance to grab market share with new offerings if ROI is managed well.
-0.75%
SG&A decline while Semiconductors grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.